Marital and Family Processes in the Context of Alcohol Use and Alcohol Disorders
- Inquiry
- Open Admission
- Published:
Associations betwixt parental alcohol problems in childhood and adversities during childhood and later on adulthood: a cross-sectional study of 28047 adults from the full general population
Substance Abuse Handling, Prevention, and Policy volume 16, Commodity number:47 (2021) Cite this commodity
Abstract
Background
Adverse babyhood experiences (ACE) are related to adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Still, few larger studies based on a general population sample with age groups ranging from young adults to elderly have investigated whether parental booze problems increase the risk of offspring subjective reports of ACE both during childhood and current adult adversities. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between parental booze problems and adversities during childhood and later in machismo.
Methods
The 28,047 respondents were adults (> 18 years old) from the general population who participated in the Norwegian Counties Public Health Survey. The study had a cross-sectional pattern and included respondents' evaluations of childhood experiences and electric current adult adversities. The curt version of the Children of Alcoholics Screening Test (Bandage-vi, cut-off ≥three) measured parental alcohol problems. Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for gender, age, and education.
Results
Growing upward with parental alcohol issues strongly increased the risk of experiencing a dysfunctional family environment during childhood (odds ratio [OR] vi.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.36–7.36), perceiving childhood as difficult (OR 5.01; 95% CI 4.58–5.49), and reporting a lack of support from a trusted adult (OR 3.07; 95% CI ii.86–3.29). Parental alcohol problems were associated with a modestly increased risk of harmful booze use (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.29–1.48), but the clan with struggling with bad memories was strong (OR 4.56; 95% CI 4.17–4.98).
Conclusions
Parental alcohol problems increased the risk of offspring experiencing adversities during both babyhood and machismo. Providing supportive services to these children and their families and addressing this issue as role of treatment is important to foreclose booze related harm.
Background
Excessive booze utilise has the potential to inflict collateral damage beyond the health bug experienced by the drinker, and there is a growing interest in studying alcohol'south harm to others [1]. Children living in families in which the parents drinkable excessively are particularly vulnerable to harmful consequences, as they possess little control over their own state of affairs. For instance, the children are more probable to experience adversities, such as a dysfunctional family unit environment, emotional abuse, violence, and fail [2,iii,four,five,6,7]. Equally one of the most prevalent adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), excessive parental alcohol use negatively affects a range of health outcomes [8] and may lead to long-term adverse outcomes, such as mental health bug and substance use as adults [2, 6, seven, 9, 10]. As ACEs may affect life differently because of the varying balance of risk factors and protective factors, information technology is relevant to map resilience factors, such every bit emotional support given by a condom and trusted grown-up [eleven, 12].
Screening for ACEs has traditionally included various types of experiences, mapping the specific ACEs considered to be most important and leaving out other adverse experiences. Previously published studies in this inquiry area take likewise focussed on the quantity of experiences, and studies take indicated a cumulative effect of multiple ACEs with graded relationships to various health-related outcomes [thirteen]. When trying to capture a person's aggregated ACEs, parental alcohol corruption is typically included every bit part of a summed score reflecting ACE severity [14]. However, including parental alcohol abuse along with other ACEs cannot reveal the extent to which parental booze issues human activity equally a gamble cistron for other ACEs [15]. Thus, investigating whether parental alcohol consumption may be associated with increased risk of other types of harmful life experiences is warranted.
Defining childhood equally difficult is a potent predictor of adverse health outcomes in adulthood [sixteen], and Graeber et al. [17] institute that, regardless of the number of different types of adverse experiences reported, perceiving them as having a loftier impact and how the person rated this impact (positive or negative) were strongly associated with adult health-related quality of life. Approaching ACEs through self-reported items, in which respondents provide self-perceived descriptions of their childhood and the impact of hard life experiences, could supplement previous research focussing on whether a respondent's adverse experience was reported [17].
Studies on the short-term and long-term effects of living with parental booze misuse during babyhood have oftentimes relied on college, university, or clinical samples, and these non-random samples may not be representative of the general population [xi, 18]. A previous systematic review examining instruments measuring childhood adversities reported a lack of randomly selected samples representative of larger populations and a reliance on convenience samples [fourteen]. Investigating parental booze bug and potential associations with other types of adversities in larger samples based on the general population could supplement existing findings.
The overall purpose of the present written report was to investigate whether exposure to parental alcohol problems during childhood is associated with other adversities during babyhood and adulthood. In improver, we wanted to accost this issue based on data from a large sample drawn randomly from the general population. Specifically, we aimed to examine whether parental alcohol problems in childhood are associated with living in a dysfunctional family environs during childhood, perceiving childhood as hard, a lack of accessible trusted developed during childhood, struggling with bad memories in adulthood, or harmful alcohol use in machismo.
Methods
Participants and procedures
The present cross-sectional survey is office of the Norwegian Counties Public Health Survey (NCPHS) Footnote one designed to provide data nearly health and wellness-related behaviours amongst adults at the community level across Norway. A random sample of 75,191 adult residents (≥eighteen years erstwhile) from all 30 municipalities in the southern region of Norway was drawn from the National Register (31.6% of the adult population in this region). After removing deceased persons, those registered in the Contact and Reservation Register with unverified contact information, or those with an address outside the included municipalities, a total of 61,611 residents were invited by SMS and email to participate in this report during the fall of 2019.
A total of 28,047 adults participated (response rate, 45.five%). Participants consented past filling out an online consent form and took approximately xv min to complete the survey. Participants had the opportunity to withdraw from the written report at any time.
Measures
Sociodemographic variables
Teaching level was determined by the post-obit question: "What is your highest completed level of education?" Response options were: one) primary school (up to 10 years of education), 2) high school (upward to 13 years of education), 3) university or university college (upward to sixteen years of education), 4) university or university higher (sixteen years of instruction or more than). The first option was defined as lower education, the second equally eye level education, and options iii and 4 were combined into higher teaching. Information about age and gender was retrieved from the national population register.
Bandage-six
The curt version of the Children of Alcoholics Screening Test (CAST-six) [19] was used to identify participants who had experienced parental booze bug during babyhood. CAST-half-dozen was developed from the original 30-particular version [xx]. This vi-item measure was designed to assess whether participants perceive their parents' alcohol consumption as problematic by asking the following questions: "Have yous ever thought that one of your parents had a drinking problem?" "Did yous e'er encourage one of your parents to quit drinking?" "Did you ever argue or fight with a parent when he or she was drinking?" "Have you ever heard your parents fight when one of them was boozer?" "Did y'all always feel like hiding or emptying a parents' canteen of liquor?" "Did you ever wish that a parent would stop drinking?" Each item in the CAST-half-dozen could be answered with Yes (1 signal) or No (0 points). The total score for CAST-6 was the sum of the private scores for each question; ≥iii was used every bit a cutting-off for because a respondent as having been exposed to parental alcohol problems. The validity of Cast-6 has been confirmed in adult populations, and the instrument has demonstrated loftier internal consistency (r = 0.92–0.94) and exam-retest reliability (r = 0.93) compared to the original 30-particular version (r = 0.93) using the recommended threshold of ≥3 [xix, 21].
Assessment of other difficulties in childhood
This study includes four questions related to hard childhood experiences originally developed for the HUNT Study (The Trøndelag Health written report). The HUNT 3 wave [22] included a unmarried particular measuring difficult childhood, and this proved to be strongly related to negative health outcomes [16]. Participants were asked if they would draw their babyhood every bit very expert, skillful, boilerplate, difficult, or very hard. For the analyses, the two latter response categories were combined into a "difficult childhood" category, and the others were treated as a reference group. The HUNT databank extended the number of questions about babyhood in the quaternary moving ridge (HUNT4), and these were also included in the Agder Public Health Written report. We assessed whether respondents perceived their childhood family environment to be dysfunctional by asking whether at that place were many arguments, conflicts, or turbulence, or whether communication was difficult in their childhood home. The response categories were: "to a very great extent", "to a great extent", "to a express extent", "to a very express extent", and "non at all". The first two categories were combined and divers as "dysfunctional family environment" and the others were combined to a reference group.
Nosotros assessed whether there was an adult the respondents could seek back up from and felt safe with during babyhood. This question had the same response options as to a higher place, and those responding, "to a very limited extent", "not at all" and "to a limited extent" were defined as having a "lack of an attainable trusted adult". The others constituted a reference group.
Adverse outcomes in adulthood
We included a variable enabling participants to describe the extent to which they nonetheless struggled with bad memories from childhood due to loss, being allow downwardly, neglect, violence, ill treatment, or abuse. Response categories were the same as to a higher place. Those responding, "to a very great extent" and "to a great extent" were divers as "having bad memories". The others constituted a reference group.
The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the 10-item Booze Use Disorders Identification Exam (AUDIT) in the 1980s as a unproblematic method of screening for excessive alcohol use [23]. We used the short 3-detail version (Inspect-C), which enhances feasibility when using the measure out in large epidemiological surveys [24]. The AUDIT-C pertains to alcohol use patterns only and measures the frequency and quantity of booze utilise and the frequency of heavy episodic drinking. It performs likewise as the full AUDIT in identifying heavy drinkers [24]. Early studies suggested a cut-off of ≥iv to achieve an acceptable ratio between sensitivity and specificity in order to avert likewise many false positives [24]. Afterwards studies recommended a slightly higher cut-off for men (≥v) only kept ≥4 for women [25, 26], and we applied this cut-off here.
Statistical analysis
The sociodemographic characteristics of the sample are presented in Tabular array 1. Chi-squared tests were used to place differences in the prevalence of agin outcomes between respondents who had been exposed to parental alcohol problems and those who had not (Tabular array two). Finally, multivariable logistic models were used to examine possible associations between parental alcohol problems and adverse outcomes. All models were adjusted for gender, age, and instruction level. Significance was divers as p < 0.05. All analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS version 25.
Results
Slightly more women (53.ii%) than men (46.eight%) participated in this study. Almost half (48.4%) of the respondents reported a higher pedagogy level.
One in half dozen respondents had a Bandage-6 score > 3, indicating parental alcohol problems during babyhood. A minority (8.4%) perceived their childhood as difficult or very difficult, but approximately one in six indicated that they grew up in a dysfunctional family surroundings. Lacking a trusted developed during babyhood was more than common, with more than one in five reporting inaccessibility to a trusted adult. Less than one in ten (ix.two%) struggled with bad memories of violence, abuse, or neglect, and the most prevalent of our upshot variables was electric current harmful alcohol use among respondents (36.7%).
Tabular array two shows an unadjusted comparison betwixt those reporting parental booze problems versus those without this experience. Those who were exposed to parental alcohol problems were > 4-times more likely to perceive their childhood as difficult (23.7% versus v.6%). Growing up in a dysfunctional family environment was more than 4-times more common among respondents exposed to parental alcohol bug, and more than twice as many respondents among those who grew up with parental alcohol bug reported lack of access to a trusted adult during babyhood compared to the other respondents (41.one% versus 18.3%). Those who grew up with parental alcohol problems were 4-times more likely to struggle with bad memories of abuse/fail/violence (24.seven% vs. 6.four%). We found only a modest 8.iv% higher proportion of respondents with harmful alcohol use amid those who had experienced problematic parental alcohol utilize compared to those without the exposure (43.ix% versus 35.v%, Table 2).
The results from multivariable analyses of associations betwixt parental alcohol misuse during childhood and the various adverse outcomes adapted for gender, age, and education are given in Table 3. Effects estimates (odds ratio [OR] and 95% conviction interval [CI]) for the associations between exposure and outcomes are visualized in a wood plot in Fig. i.
Multivariable logistic regression. Visualization of the adapted (for gender, historic period, and teaching) estimates of associations betwixt parental alcohol bug and adversities during childhood and adulthood based on the Agder County Public Wellness Study (Kingdom of norway 2019). Data are presented as adjusted odds ratios and 95% conviction intervals
Growing upwardly with parental booze bug was conspicuously associated with a retrospective perception of a childhood characterized by challenging cirumstances, such as a dysfunctional family unit environment (OR vi.84; 95% CI 6.36–7.36), describing childhood as difficult (OR v.01; 95% CI four.58–5.49) and defective admission to a trusted adult as a kid (OR iii.07; 95% CI ii.86–3.29),). We also plant a strong association betwixt experiencing parental alcohol issues in childhood and struggling with bad memories, such as of abuse, fail, or violence, as an adult (OR 4.56; 95% CI four.17–4.98). Growing up with parental alcohol problems only modestly increased the odds of respondents reporting their own harmful alcohol consumption (OR one.38; 95% CI one.29–1.48). Equally this clan was weaker than expected, we performed sensitivity analyses with a college cut-off (> 8 for both genders), besides as with a lower cutting-off (three for women and 4 for men), without markedly irresolute the result (results not shown).
Discussion
In this study, we investigated whether growing upward with parental booze problems is associated with other adversities during babyhood and later in adulthood. We revealed a very strong clan betwixt parental booze problems and experiencing a dysfunctional family environment characterized past arguments, tension, conflicts, or poor advice. These findings confirm previously published studies showing that parental alcohol issues tin can have a negative impact on family dynamics [27,28,29]. When circumstances around a child are difficult, the presence of other protective factors may buffer the touch on of adverse experiences [11, 12]. Yet, our findings suggest that adults who report to have parents who drank excessively during childhood also were more than likely to lack access to a trusted adult from whom they could seek back up when they were immature. Adults with experiences with parental alcohol problems more often described their childhood overall as difficult, which is in line with findings reported by other studies [v, seven].
Excessive alcohol use may impair parents' ability to create a safe environment for their children and increment the run a risk of emotional and physical abuse and child fail [iv, 5, 7, thirty, 31]. Such experiences may remain a brunt as children get adults. Our written report corroborated these findings; adults who had experienced parental alcohol problems in childhood had strongly increased odds of struggling with bad memories due to loss, being let down, neglect, violence, ill treatment, or corruption. This concurs with the study by Hall and Webster, who plant that young adult children of parents with alcohol problems had enhanced traumatic effect symptomatology compared to adults who, as children, experienced traumatic events other than parental booze problems and those who indicated neither problem [32].
Surprisingly, the association between parental alcohol problems in babyhood and harmful booze use in adulthood were small-scale and the weakest of all associations in our report (OR = 1.38). This contrasts the report by Anda et al. [5], who establish a strong relationship betwixt parental alcoholism and personal alcoholism (OR = 3.v/four.5 for begetter/female parent alcoholism and OR = five.6 for both parents). Notably, our study did not apply personal alcoholism every bit an effect, only a frequency-quantity measure out (AUDIT-C). The loftier percentage of harmful alcohol use in our study indicates that our group of respondents did non institute only persons with an alcohol use disorder. Previous Norwegian studies accept establish a significantly lower lifetime prevalence of alcohol dependence or abuse (9.4 and 22.7% [33]) than the proportion of respondents in our report with harmful alcohol utilize. However, when we re-examined our analysis with a stricter cut-off (AUDIT-C ≥ 8), which would capture a grouping with more than heavy drinking, the strength of the estimate remained modest, indicating a contrary finding to Anda et al.'southward written report [34]. The deviation may be explained by the sample differences; Anda et al. examined a clinical sample of adults who visited a chief intendance clinic, whereas we examined a full general population sample.
Whether problematic parental alcohol use has a causal inference for adult alcohol use in offspring cannot be determined past the present report. Still, a systematic review suggested that parental drinking predicts drinking behaviour in offspring during boyhood [35]. Anda et al. [5] showed that the risk of developing an alcohol employ disorder increases with the number of agin experiences in childhood, and our information back up the first part of his findings. A Swedish adoption study [36] shows that substance use disorder is an etiologically circuitous phenomenon that is influenced by both genetic risk factors and environmental factors, and the interactions betwixt these. The increased hazard of harmful alcohol utilise found amidst our respondents with parents with alcohol problems may therefore partly be explained past genetic disposition.
Methodological considerations
Although we included retrospective data about babyhood, our study was, in principle, cross-sectional, and the usual caveat well-nigh a cross-sectional design must be considered. Findings should be interpreted with caution with regards to causality. Research within the ACE-field has shown that babyhood adversities are often interrelated [15], and we cannot out rule the possibility of the co-existing factors that may contribute to explain the association between parental booze utilize and the agin outcomes in our study.
The large sample drawn randomly from a full general population including all age groups > 18 years provided an opportunity to examine the human relationship between parental alcohol issues and adverse outcomes, adding to existing knowledge based on smaller clinical studies [fourteen]. The measures used to assess adverse life experiences included items about self-perceived severity, which added to the previous methodology focussing on specific types and quantity of experiences [14].
Although a previous review showed that retrospective reports of ACEs amid adults include a substantial number of imitation negatives and substantial measurement fault, false positive reports were probably rare [37]. Therefore, our study may exist hampered by nether-reporting, which may have led to an underestimation of the effects. Although some studies take found some bias in retrospective reports, Hardt and Rutter [37] claimed that the bias is not sufficient to invalidate retrospective reports in general. Whether parents recovered from their alcohol problems was not possible to take account for in this study.
Conclusion
Our report shows that exposure to parental alcohol problems during babyhood is strongly associated with both difficult life experiences during childhood and adverse outcomes later in machismo. Equally parental alcohol problems appear to be quite prevalent and, therefore, affect many families, providing back up and treatment opportunities to individuals with booze problems is fundamental to reducing the alcohol-related harm to both the drinker and the offspring. Additionally, practitioners should provide specific support to children and piece of work with the social network to ensure that children have trusted adults available.
Availability of data and materials
The data were provided by the NIPH by permission. NIPH volition brand information bachelor in a repository (https://helsedata.no/en/) upon application.
Notes
Abbreviations
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- CI:
-
Confidence Interval
- CAST-vi:
-
Children of Alcoholics Screening Examination (curt version with 6 items)
- NCPHS:
-
Norwegian Counties Public Health Survey
- ACE:
-
Adverse childhood environment
- Hunt:
-
The Nord-Trøndelag Wellness Written report
- AUDIT:
-
Booze Use Disorders Identification
- SPSS:
-
Statistical Packet for the Social Sciences
- REK:
-
The National Committees for Research Ethics in Norway
- NIPH:
-
Norwegian Constitute of Public Wellness
References
-
Warpenius K, Tigerstedt C. Positioning Alcohol's harm to others (AHTO) within alcohol research: a reinvented perspective with mixed policy implications. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016;33(5-6):487–502. https://doi.org/ten.1515/nsad-2016-0041.
-
Edwards EP, Eiden RD, Colder C, Leonard KE. The evolution of aggression in xviii to 48 month old children of alcoholic parents. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006;34(iii):409–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9021-3.
-
Leonard KE, Eiden RD. Marital and family unit processes in the context of alcohol utilise and booze disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3(1):285–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091424.
-
Finger B, Kachadourian LK, Molnar DS, Eiden RD, Edwards EP, Leonard KE. Alcoholism, associated risk factors, and harsh parenting among fathers: examining the role of marital aggression. Addict Behav. 2010;35(6):541–viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.029.
-
Anda RF, Whitfield CL, Felitti VJ, Chapman D, Edwards VJ, Dube SR, et al. Adverse childhood experiences, alcoholic parents, and afterwards gamble of alcoholism and depression. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53(8):1001–9. https://doi.org/x.1176/appi.ps.53.8.1001.
-
Bijttebier P, Goethals ER. Parental drinking as a chance factor for Children's maladjustment: the mediating function of family environment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20(2):126–xxx. https://doi.org/x.1037/0893-164X.xx.2.126.
-
Dube SR, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Croft JB, Edwards VJ, Giles WH. Growing up with parental booze corruption: exposure to childhood abuse, fail, and household dysfunction. Kid Abuse Negl. 2001;25(12):1627–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00293-9.
-
Bellis MA, Hughes K, Ford K, Ramos Rodriguez 1000, Sethi D, Passmore J. Life form health consequences and associated annual costs of adverse childhood experiences across Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(10):e517–e28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30145-eight.
-
Glahn D, Lovallo Due west, Fox P. Reduced amygdala activation in immature adults at loftier risk of alcoholism: studies from the Oklahoma family unit wellness patterns project. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61(11):1306–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.041.
-
Haverfield Yard, Theiss J. A theme analysis of experiences reported by adult children of alcoholics in online support forums. J Fam Stud. 2014;20:5150–92.
-
Park S, Schepp KG. A systematic review of research on children of alcoholics: their inherent resilience and vulnerability. J Kid Fam Stud. 2015;24(5):1222–31. https://doi.org/x.1007/s10826-014-9930-7.
-
Bellis MA, Hughes K, Ford Thou, Hardcastle KA, Precipitous CA, Forest S, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and sources of childhood resilience: a retrospective written report of their combined relationships with child health and educational attendance. BMC Public Health. 2018;eighteen(1):792. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5699-8.
-
Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, Sethi D, Butchart A, Mikton C, et al. The effect of multiple agin childhood experiences on wellness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(eight):e356–e66. https://doi.org/x.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-four.
-
Burgermeister D. Babyhood adversity: a review of measurement instruments. J Nurs Meas. 2007;15(three):163–76. https://doi.org/10.1891/106137407783095766.
-
Dong One thousand, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Dube SR, Williamson DF, Thompson TJ, et al. The interrelatedness of multiple forms of childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Kid Abuse Negl. 2004;28(seven):771–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.01.008.
-
Tomasdottir MO, Sigurdsson JA, Petursson H, Kirkengen AL, Krokstad S, McEwen B, et al. Self Reported Childhood Difficulties, Adult Multimorbidity and Allostatic Load. A Cantankerous-Sectional Assay of the Norwegian HUNT Study. PLOS ONE. 2015;x(six):e0130591.
-
Graeber DA, Helitzer DL, Noue ML, Fawcett J. The relationship between cocky-reported adult touch on of adverse babyhood events and health-related quality of life. J Community Med Wellness Educ. 2013;4:267. https://doi.org/ten.4172/2161-0711.1000267.
-
Chassin Fifty, Pitts SC, DeLucia C, Todd Chiliad. A longitudinal report of children of alcoholics: predicting young adult substance use disorders, feet, and depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1999;108(1):106–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.108.one.106.
-
Hodgins D, Maticka-Tyndale E, el-Guebaly Due north, West 1000. The CAST-6: evolution of a short-form of the children of alcoholics screening test. Addict Behav 1993;18:337–345, three, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(93)90035-8.
-
Jones JW. The children of alcoholics screening examination: test manual: Camelot unlimited; 1983.
-
Hodgins DC, Shimp L. Identifying adult children of alcoholics: methodological review and a comparing of the CAST-vi with other methods. Habit. 1995;xc(2):255–67. https://doi.org/ten.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb01043.ten.
-
Krokstad S, Langhammer A, Hveem K, Holmen TL, Midthjell K, Stene TR, et al. Cohort profile: the Chase study, Norway. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(4):968–77. https://doi.org/ten.1093/ije/dys095.
-
World Wellness O. AUDIT: the Alcohol Employ Disorders Identification Test : guidelines for use in primary health intendance / Thomas F. Babor ... [et al.]. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Arrangement; 2001. p. 487–502.
-
Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The Audit alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory care quality improvement project (ACQUIP). Alcohol use disorders identification test. Curvation Intern Med. 1998;158(xvi):1789–95. https://doi.org/x.1001/archinte.158.16.1789.
-
Rumpf H-J, Hapke U, Meyer C, John U. Screening for alcohol use disorders and at-risk drinking in the full general population: Psychometric performance of three questionnaires. Booze Alcohol. 2002;37:261–viii.
-
Nordqvist C, Johansson One thousand, Bendtsen P. Routine screening for risky alcohol consumption at an emergency department using the AUDIT-C questionnaire. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;74(1):71–five. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.xi.010.
-
Kelley ML, Pearson MR, Trinh S, Klostermann Chiliad, Krakowski Chiliad. Maternal and paternal alcoholism and depressive mood in higher students: parental relationships as mediators of ACOA-depressive mood link. Addict Behav. 2011;36(7):700–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.028.
-
Su J, Kuo SI-C, Aliev F, Guy MC, Derlan CL, Edenberg HJ, et al. Influence of parental booze dependence symptoms and parenting on adolescent risky drinking and conduct issues: a family systems perspective. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42(9):1783–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13827.
-
Finan LJ, Schulz J, Gordon MS, Ohannessian CM. Parental trouble drinking and adolescent externalizing behaviors: the mediating office of family unit operation. J Adolesc. 2015;43:100–10. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.001.
-
Eiden RD, Molnar DS, Colder C, Edwards EP, Leonard KE. A conceptual model predicting internalizing problems in heart childhood among children of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fathers: the role of marital aggression. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;70(5):741–50. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2009.70.741.
-
Freisthler B, Wolf JP, Johnson-Motoyama Chiliad. Understanding the role of context-specific drinking in neglectful parenting behaviors. Alcohol Booze. 2015;50(five):542–fifty. https://doi.org/x.1093/alcalc/agv031.
-
Hall CW, Webster RE. Traumatic symptomatology characteristics of adult children of alcoholics. J Drug Educ. 2002;32(three):195–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/U29W-LF3W-748L-A48M.
-
Kringlen E, Torgersen S, Cramer V. A Norwegian psychiatric epidemiological report. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(7):1091–8. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1091.
-
Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD, et al. The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;256(3):174–86. https://doi.org/x.1007/s00406-005-0624-four.
-
Rossow I, Keating P, Felix Fifty, McCambridge J. Does parental drinking influence children'southward drinking? A systematic review of prospective accomplice studies. Addiction. 2016;111(2):204–17. https://doi.org/x.1111/add.13097.
-
Kendler KS, Sundquist K, Ohlsson H, Palmer Grand, Maes H, Winkleby MA, et al. Genetic and familial environmental influences on the risk for drug abuse: a national Swedish adoption study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(7):690–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2112.
-
Hardt J, Rutter G. Validity of developed retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: review of the prove. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2004;45(two):260–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00218.x.
Acknowledgements
Nosotros admit the Norwegian Plant of Public Wellness and Agder County for the collection of information, along with the inhabitants of Agder who contributed through their participation. We also acknowledge the work of the Hunt Databank (HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian Academy of Science and Technology), which adult the four items measuring adverse babyhood experiences.
Funding
There was no external funding of this report.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the pattern of the report. SHH performed the analyses. All authors participated in the interpretation of the findings, drafting of the manuscript and approved the final version.
Respective author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Legal responsibility for the public health survey is held past the Norwegian Found of Public Health (NIPH), and the written report was conducted in accord with the Annunciation of Helsinki.
Upstanding approval was obtained from The National Committees for Inquiry Ethics in Norway (REK) (file number 162353) and from the Faculty Ethical Committee at the University of Agder. Participants was informed co-ordinate to the standards of the Norwegian Data Inspectorate and consented online by participating in the survey.
Consent for publication
Non applicative.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Boosted information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give advisable credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party textile in this article are included in the commodity's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If textile is non included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission straight from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/four.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/nil/one.0/) applies to the data made bachelor in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and Permissions
Nearly this article
Cite this article
Haugland, Southward.H., Carvalho, B., Stea, T.H. et al. Associations betwixt parental alcohol problems in childhood and adversities during childhood and later on machismo: a cross-sectional study of 28047 adults from the general population. Subst Corruption Treat Prev Policy 16, 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00384-9
-
Accepted:
-
Published:
-
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00384-9
Keywords
- Family
- Parents
- Alcohol drinking
- Developed survivors of child adverse events
hawthornefuldebou.blogspot.com
Source: https://substanceabusepolicy.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13011-021-00384-9
Hi, I’ve been a lurker around your blog for a few months. I love this article and your entire site! Looking forward to reading more! set up fitbit charge 3 I admire what you have done here. I love the part where you say you are doing this to give back but I would assume by all the comments that is working for you as well. Do you have any more info on this?
ReplyDelete